Prices as of 2026/10/30 close
Company comparison
Daiwa House is the bigger company, with revenue of ¥5.6T — 7.7x Hulic's ¥727.4B.
Hulic earns more on each yen of sales, with an operating margin of 25.7% — 14.7 points above Daiwa House (11.0%).
Revenue growth in the latest results: Hulic +22.9%, Daiwa House +2.6%. For next year, Hulic guides for the fastest operating profit growth (+12.4%).
Hulic pays more on average — ¥20.4M against ¥9.92M at Daiwa House.
Over the past year the shares moved Hulic +15.6%, Daiwa House −12.8%.
Head-to-head wins15 metrics
One win per metric for the company with the best value. Metrics with no better or worse (P/E, average age, employees) are excluded.
ScaleInvestors
Daiwa House aheadDaiwa House 3 : Hulic 0
Revenue: Daiwa House ¥5.6T / Hulic ¥727.4B
ProfitabilityInvestors
Hulic aheadDaiwa House 0 : Hulic 3
Operating margin: Daiwa House 11.0% / Hulic 25.7%
GrowthInvestors
Hulic aheadDaiwa House 0 : Hulic 4
Revenue growth (YoY): Daiwa House +2.6% / Hulic +22.9%
Stock & balance sheetInvestors
Hulic aheadDaiwa House 0 : Hulic 2
Share price, 1 year: Daiwa House −12.8% / Hulic +15.6%
Pay & workforceJob seekers
Daiwa House aheadDaiwa House 2 : Hulic 1
Average salary: Daiwa House ¥9.92M / Hulic ¥20.4M
| Metric | Daiwa House | Hulic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ◎¥5.6T | ¥727.4B | 7.7x |
| Operating profit | ◎¥614.9B | ¥186.8B | 3.3x |
| Net income | ◎¥350.6B | ¥114.3B | 3.1x |
| Metric | Daiwa House | Hulic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | 11.0% | ◎25.7% | 14.7pt |
| Net margin | 6.3% | ◎15.7% | 9.4pt |
| ROE | — | 13.0% | |
| Revenue per employee | ¥344M | ◎¥3.1B | 9.1x |
| Metric | Daiwa House | Hulic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +2.6% | ◎+22.9% | 20.3pt |
| Operating profit growth (YoY) | +12.6% | ◎+14.3% | 1.7pt |
| Revenue CAGRlast 5 years | +6.2% | ◎+12.9% | 6.7pt |
| Guidance: revenue growthnext FY plan | +4.0% | — | |
| Guidance: op. profit growthnext FY plan | −34.9% | ◎+12.4% | 47.4pt |
| Metric | Daiwa House | Hulic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Share price, 1 year | −12.8% | ◎+15.6% | 28.5pt |
| Share price, 3 months | −5.5% | ◎−1.4% | 4.2pt |
| P/E (trailing)lower = cheaper | — | 12.0x | |
| Equity ratio | — | 26.8% | |
| Share price (close) | ¥2,282.5 | ¥1,804.5 |
◎ marks the best value for each metric. Revenue and profit are from the latest full-year earnings release; share prices are closing-price references; P/E = latest close ÷ trailing EPS. For banks and some other financials, revenue means ordinary income.
| Metric | Daiwa House | Hulic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average salary | ¥9.92M | ◎¥20.4M | ¥10.4M |
| Starting salary (monthly) | ◎¥350,000 | ¥330,000 | ¥20,000 |
| Average tenure | ◎15.6 yrs | 6.8 yrs | 8.8 |
| Average age | 40.6 | 38.9 | 1.7 |
| Employees | 16,192 | 233 | 69.5x |
Average salary is for the reporting (parent) company and is affected by average age and job mix. Holding companies with few employees are left out of the salary comparison.
Close (Oct 30, 2026)
¥2,282.5-12.8% (1Y)
Daiwa House -12.8% over 1Y. Compared: Hulic +15.6%.
Reference chart of daily closing prices, not real-time quotes (split-adjusted; weekly closes before the last year). Each line shows the % change from the start of the period. Updated Oct 30, 2026.
Daiwa House4 segments
Hulic4 segments
AAverage annual salary from the securities filings: Hulic ¥20.4M, Daiwa House ¥9.92M. Hulic pays the most. Averages also depend on staff age and job mix, so check the average age too (Daiwa House 40.6, Hulic 38.9).
ARevenue in the latest results: Daiwa House ¥5.6T, Hulic ¥727.4B. Daiwa House is the bigger company, with revenue of ¥5.6T — 7.7x Hulic's ¥727.4B.
AOperating margins: Hulic 25.7%, Daiwa House 11.0%. Hulic turns the highest share of sales into operating profit.
AShare price change over the past year (closing prices, for reference): Hulic +15.6%, Daiwa House −12.8%. Hulic has risen the most.
Comparing 2 companies (up to 4)
Sources: earnings releases (kessan tanshin), annual securities reports and other public information. Share prices are closing-price references, not real-time. Our data may contain errors; investment decisions are your own responsibility.
