Prices as of 2026/10/30 close
Company comparison
Daiwa is the bigger company, with revenue of ¥1.5T — 27.9x Matsui Securities's ¥52.7B.
Matsui Securities earns more on each yen of sales, with an operating margin of 44.6% — 30.4 points above Daiwa (14.1%).
Revenue growth in the latest results: Matsui Securities +34.3%, Daiwa +7.0%.
Daiwa pays more on average — ¥16.3M against ¥11.5M at Matsui Securities.
Over the past year the shares moved Daiwa +44.4%, Matsui Securities +33.4%.
Head-to-head wins13 metrics
One win per metric for the company with the best value. Metrics with no better or worse (P/E, average age, employees) are excluded.
ScaleInvestors
Daiwa aheadDaiwa 3 : Matsui Securities 0
Revenue: Daiwa ¥1.5T / Matsui Securities ¥52.7B
ProfitabilityInvestors
Matsui Securities aheadDaiwa 1 : Matsui Securities 2
Operating margin: Daiwa 14.1% / Matsui Securities 44.6%
GrowthInvestors
Matsui Securities aheadDaiwa 0 : Matsui Securities 2
Revenue growth (YoY): Daiwa +7.0% / Matsui Securities +34.3%
Stock & balance sheetInvestors
EvenDaiwa 1 : Matsui Securities 1
Share price, 1 year: Daiwa +44.4% / Matsui Securities +33.4%
Pay & workforceJob seekers
Daiwa aheadDaiwa 2 : Matsui Securities 1
Average salary: Daiwa ¥16.3M / Matsui Securities ¥11.5M
| Metric | Daiwa | Matsui Securities | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ◎¥1.5T | ¥52.7B | 27.9x |
| Operating profit | ◎¥207.3B | ¥23.5B | 8.8x |
| Net income | ◎¥175.3B | ¥15.5B | 11.3x |
| Metric | Daiwa | Matsui Securities | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | 14.1% | ◎44.6% | 30.4pt |
| Net margin | 11.9% | ◎29.4% | 17.5pt |
| ROE | — | 19.6% | |
| Revenue per employee | ◎¥3.0B | ¥232M | 12.8x |
| Metric | Daiwa | Matsui Securities | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +7.0% | ◎+34.3% | 27.3pt |
| Operating profit growth (YoY) | +24.3% | ◎+50.1% | 25.8pt |
| Revenue CAGRlast 5 years | +20.6% | — |
| Metric | Daiwa | Matsui Securities | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Share price, 1 year | ◎+44.4% | +33.4% | 11.0pt |
| Share price, 3 months | −5.2% | ◎−3.5% | 1.7pt |
| P/E (trailing)lower = cheaper | — | 16.9x | |
| Equity ratio | — | 6.1% | |
| Share price (close) | ¥1,698.5 | ¥1,015 |
◎ marks the best value for each metric. Revenue and profit are from the latest full-year earnings release; share prices are closing-price references; P/E = latest close ÷ trailing EPS. For banks and some other financials, revenue means ordinary income.
| Metric | Daiwa | Matsui Securities | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average salary | ◎¥16.3M | ¥11.5M | ¥4.72M |
| Starting salary (monthly) | ¥290,000 | ◎¥345,000 | ¥55,000 |
| Average tenure | ◎13.7 yrs | 9.7 yrs | 4.0 |
| Average age | 40.9 | 37.3 | 3.6 |
| Employees | 494 | 227 | 2.2x |
Average salary is for the reporting (parent) company and is affected by average age and job mix. Holding companies with few employees are left out of the salary comparison.
Close (Oct 30, 2026)
¥1,698.5+44.4% (1Y)
Daiwa +44.4% over 1Y. Compared: Matsui Securities +33.4%.
Reference chart of daily closing prices, not real-time quotes (split-adjusted; weekly closes before the last year). Each line shows the % change from the start of the period. Updated Oct 30, 2026.
Daiwa3 segments
Matsui Securities1 segments
AAverage annual salary from the securities filings: Daiwa ¥16.3M, Matsui Securities ¥11.5M. Daiwa pays the most. Averages also depend on staff age and job mix, so check the average age too (Daiwa 40.9, Matsui Securities 37.3).
ARevenue in the latest results: Daiwa ¥1.5T, Matsui Securities ¥52.7B. Daiwa is the bigger company, with revenue of ¥1.5T — 27.9x Matsui Securities's ¥52.7B.
AOperating margins: Matsui Securities 44.6%, Daiwa 14.1%. Matsui Securities turns the highest share of sales into operating profit.
AShare price change over the past year (closing prices, for reference): Daiwa +44.4%, Matsui Securities +33.4%. Daiwa has risen the most.
Comparing 2 companies (up to 4)
Sources: earnings releases (kessan tanshin), annual securities reports and other public information. Share prices are closing-price references, not real-time. Our data may contain errors; investment decisions are your own responsibility.
