Prices as of 2026/10/30 close
Company comparison · Seafood, Meat & Frozen Foods
Umios (¥1.1T) and Itoham Yonekyu (¥1.1T) are about the same size by revenue.
Operating margins are level: Umios 2.8%, Itoham Yonekyu 2.7%.
Revenue growth in the latest results: Itoham Yonekyu +8.4%, Umios +2.5%. For next year, Umios guides for the fastest operating profit growth (+2.6%).
Umios pays more on average — ¥7.83M against ¥7.66M at Itoham Yonekyu.
Over the past year the shares moved Umios +8.0%, Itoham Yonekyu −10.2%.
Head-to-head wins17 metrics
One win per metric for the company with the best value. Metrics with no better or worse (P/E, average age, employees) are excluded.
ScaleInvestors
Umios aheadUmios 3 : Itoham Yonekyu 0
Revenue: Umios ¥1.1T / Itoham Yonekyu ¥1.1T
ProfitabilityInvestors
Umios aheadUmios 3 : Itoham Yonekyu 1
Operating margin: Umios 2.8% / Itoham Yonekyu 2.7%
GrowthInvestors
EvenUmios 2 : Itoham Yonekyu 2
Revenue growth (YoY): Umios +2.5% / Itoham Yonekyu +8.4%
Stock & balance sheetInvestors
Itoham Yonekyu aheadUmios 1 : Itoham Yonekyu 2
Share price, 1 year: Umios +8.0% / Itoham Yonekyu −10.2%
Pay & workforceJob seekers
Itoham Yonekyu aheadUmios 1 : Itoham Yonekyu 2
Average salary: Umios ¥7.83M / Itoham Yonekyu ¥7.66M
| Metric | Umios | Itoham Yonekyu | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ◎¥1.1T | ¥1.1T | 1.0x |
| Operating profit | ◎¥31.2B | ¥28.5B | 1.1x |
| Net income | ◎¥22.2B | ¥20.2B | 1.1x |
| Metric | Umios | Itoham Yonekyu | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | ◎2.8% | 2.7% | 0.2pt |
| Net margin | ◎2.0% | 1.9% | 0.1pt |
| ROE | ◎9.3% | 7.0% | 2.3pt |
| Revenue per employee | ¥636M | ◎¥1.4B | 2.2x |
| Metric | Umios | Itoham Yonekyu | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +2.5% | ◎+8.4% | 5.9pt |
| Operating profit growth (YoY) | +2.7% | ◎+45.4% | 42.7pt |
| Guidance: revenue growthnext FY plan | ◎+0.4% | −2.9% | 3.3pt |
| Guidance: op. profit growthnext FY plan | ◎+2.6% | −5.1% | 7.7pt |
| Metric | Umios | Itoham Yonekyu | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Share price, 1 year | ◎+8.0% | −10.2% | 18.2pt |
| Share price, 3 months | −11.1% | ◎−3.5% | 7.7pt |
| P/E (trailing)lower = cheaper | 8.2x | 13.7x | |
| Equity ratio | 38.8% | ◎56.3% | 17.5pt |
| Share price (close) | ¥1,203 | ¥4,885 |
◎ marks the best value for each metric. Revenue and profit are from the latest full-year earnings release; share prices are closing-price references; P/E = latest close ÷ trailing EPS. For banks and some other financials, revenue means ordinary income.
| Metric | Umios | Itoham Yonekyu | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average salary | ◎¥7.83M | ¥7.66M | ¥0.17M |
| Starting salary (monthly) | ¥274,000 | ◎¥277,210 | ¥3,210 |
| Average tenure | 14.4 yrs | ◎16.4 yrs | 2.0 |
| Average age | 41.0 | 41.0 | 0.0 |
| Employees | 1,738 | 777 | 2.2x |
Average salary is for the reporting (parent) company and is affected by average age and job mix. Holding companies with few employees are left out of the salary comparison.
Close (Oct 30, 2026)
¥1,203+8.0% (1Y)
Umios +8.0% over 1Y. Compared: Itoham Yonekyu -10.2%.
Reference chart of daily closing prices, not real-time quotes (split-adjusted; weekly closes before the last year). Each line shows the % change from the start of the period. Updated Oct 30, 2026.
Umios4 segments
Itoham Yonekyu2 segments
AAverage annual salary from the securities filings: Umios ¥7.83M, Itoham Yonekyu ¥7.66M. Umios pays the most. Averages also depend on staff age and job mix, so check the average age too (Umios 41.0, Itoham Yonekyu 41.0).
ARevenue in the latest results: Umios ¥1.1T, Itoham Yonekyu ¥1.1T. Umios (¥1.1T) and Itoham Yonekyu (¥1.1T) are about the same size by revenue.
AOperating margins: Umios 2.8%, Itoham Yonekyu 2.7%. Umios turns the highest share of sales into operating profit.
AShare price change over the past year (closing prices, for reference): Umios +8.0%, Itoham Yonekyu −10.2%. Umios has risen the most.
Comparing 2 companies (up to 4)
Sources: earnings releases (kessan tanshin), annual securities reports and other public information. Share prices are closing-price references, not real-time. Our data may contain errors; investment decisions are your own responsibility.
