Prices as of 2026/10/30 close
Company comparison
Kubota is the bigger company, with revenue of ¥3.0T — 17.3x Yamabiko's ¥174.0B.
Yamabiko earns more on each yen of sales, with an operating margin of 11.3% — 2.5 points above Kubota (8.8%).
Revenue growth in the latest results: Yamabiko +5.6%, Kubota +0.1%. For next year, Kubota guides for the fastest operating profit growth (+13.0%).
Kubota pays more on average — ¥8.25M against ¥8.06M at Yamabiko.
Over the past year the shares moved Yamabiko +65.7%, Kubota +26.8%.
Head-to-head wins17 metrics
One win per metric for the company with the best value. Metrics with no better or worse (P/E, average age, employees) are excluded.
ScaleInvestors
Kubota aheadKubota 3 : Yamabiko 0
Revenue: Kubota ¥3.0T / Yamabiko ¥174.0B
ProfitabilityInvestors
Yamabiko aheadKubota 1 : Yamabiko 3
Operating margin: Kubota 8.8% / Yamabiko 11.3%
GrowthInvestors
Yamabiko aheadKubota 1 : Yamabiko 3
Revenue growth (YoY): Kubota +0.1% / Yamabiko +5.6%
Stock & balance sheetInvestors
Yamabiko aheadKubota 0 : Yamabiko 3
Share price, 1 year: Kubota +26.8% / Yamabiko +65.7%
Pay & workforceJob seekers
Kubota aheadKubota 2 : Yamabiko 1
Average salary: Kubota ¥8.25M / Yamabiko ¥8.06M
| Metric | Kubota | Yamabiko | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ◎¥3.0T | ¥174.0B | 17.3x |
| Operating profit | ◎¥265.5B | ¥19.7B | 13.5x |
| Net income | ◎¥216.8B | ¥14.4B | 15.0x |
| Metric | Kubota | Yamabiko | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | 8.8% | ◎11.3% | 2.5pt |
| Net margin | 7.2% | ◎8.3% | 1.1pt |
| ROE | 7.3% | ◎12.7% | 5.4pt |
| Revenue per employee | ◎¥195M | ¥160M | 1.2x |
| Metric | Kubota | Yamabiko | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +0.1% | ◎+5.6% | 5.5pt |
| Operating profit growth (YoY) | −15.9% | ◎+0.4% | 16.3pt |
| Revenue CAGRlast 4 years | +8.3% | — | |
| Guidance: revenue growthnext FY plan | +4.3% | ◎+6.3% | 2.0pt |
| Guidance: op. profit growthnext FY plan | ◎+13.0% | +6.5% | 6.5pt |
| Metric | Kubota | Yamabiko | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Share price, 1 year | +26.8% | ◎+65.7% | 38.8pt |
| Share price, 3 months | −6.5% | ◎+11.7% | 18.2pt |
| P/E (trailing)lower = cheaper | 16.0x | 12.0x | |
| Equity ratio | 46.3% | ◎70.8% | 24.5pt |
| Share price (close) | ¥2,611 | ¥4,240 |
◎ marks the best value for each metric. Revenue and profit are from the latest full-year earnings release; share prices are closing-price references; P/E = latest close ÷ trailing EPS. For banks and some other financials, revenue means ordinary income.
| Metric | Kubota | Yamabiko | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average salary | ◎¥8.25M | ¥8.06M | ¥0.19M |
| Starting salary (monthly) | ◎¥290,000 | ¥285,480 | ¥4,520 |
| Average tenure | 13.5 yrs | ◎18.4 yrs | 4.9 |
| Average age | 39.9 | 44.1 | 4.2 |
| Employees | 15,472 | 1,085 | 14.3x |
Average salary is for the reporting (parent) company and is affected by average age and job mix. Holding companies with few employees are left out of the salary comparison.
Close (Oct 30, 2026)
¥2,611+26.8% (1Y)
Kubota +26.8% over 1Y. Compared: Yamabiko +65.7%.
Reference chart of daily closing prices, not real-time quotes (split-adjusted; weekly closes before the last year). Each line shows the % change from the start of the period. Updated Oct 30, 2026.
Kubota3 segments
Yamabiko4 segments
AAverage annual salary from the securities filings: Kubota ¥8.25M, Yamabiko ¥8.06M. Kubota pays the most. Averages also depend on staff age and job mix, so check the average age too (Kubota 39.9, Yamabiko 44.1).
ARevenue in the latest results: Kubota ¥3.0T, Yamabiko ¥174.0B. Kubota is the bigger company, with revenue of ¥3.0T — 17.3x Yamabiko's ¥174.0B.
AOperating margins: Yamabiko 11.3%, Kubota 8.8%. Yamabiko turns the highest share of sales into operating profit.
AShare price change over the past year (closing prices, for reference): Yamabiko +65.7%, Kubota +26.8%. Yamabiko has risen the most.
Comparing 2 companies (up to 4)
Sources: earnings releases (kessan tanshin), annual securities reports and other public information. Share prices are closing-price references, not real-time. Our data may contain errors; investment decisions are your own responsibility.
