Prices as of 2026/10/30 close
Company comparison · Motors & Power Equipment
Mabuchi is the bigger company, with revenue of ¥200.4B — 1.6x Sinfonia's ¥128.2B.
Sinfonia earns more on each yen of sales, with an operating margin of 14.4% — 1.7 points above Mabuchi (12.7%).
Revenue growth in the latest results: Sinfonia +7.6%, Mabuchi +2.1%. For next year, Sinfonia guides for the fastest operating profit growth (+13.7%).
Mabuchi pays more on average — ¥7.64M against ¥7.49M at Sinfonia.
Over the past year the shares moved Mabuchi +32.4%, Sinfonia +3.3%.
Head-to-head wins16 metrics
One win per metric for the company with the best value. Metrics with no better or worse (P/E, average age, employees) are excluded.
ScaleInvestors
Mabuchi aheadMabuchi 3 : Sinfonia 0
Revenue: Mabuchi ¥200.4B / Sinfonia ¥128.2B
ProfitabilityInvestors
EvenMabuchi 2 : Sinfonia 2
Operating margin: Mabuchi 12.7% / Sinfonia 14.4%
GrowthInvestors
Sinfonia aheadMabuchi 1 : Sinfonia 3
Revenue growth (YoY): Mabuchi +2.1% / Sinfonia +7.6%
Stock & balance sheetInvestors
Mabuchi aheadMabuchi 3 : Sinfonia 0
Share price, 1 year: Mabuchi +32.4% / Sinfonia +3.3%
Pay & workforceJob seekers
EvenMabuchi 1 : Sinfonia 1
Average salary: Mabuchi ¥7.64M / Sinfonia ¥7.49M
| Metric | Mabuchi | Sinfonia | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ◎¥200.4B | ¥128.2B | 1.6x |
| Operating profit | ◎¥25.5B | ¥18.5B | 1.4x |
| Net income | ◎¥26.3B | ¥14.5B | 1.8x |
| Metric | Mabuchi | Sinfonia | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | 12.7% | ◎14.4% | 1.7pt |
| Net margin | ◎13.1% | 11.3% | 1.8pt |
| ROE | 8.0% | ◎16.2% | 8.2pt |
| Revenue per employee | ◎¥264M | ¥62M | 4.3x |
| Metric | Mabuchi | Sinfonia | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +2.1% | ◎+7.6% | 5.5pt |
| Operating profit growth (YoY) | ◎+17.7% | +17.4% | 0.3pt |
| Guidance: revenue growthnext FY plan | +6.3% | ◎+9.2% | 2.9pt |
| Guidance: op. profit growthnext FY plan | +2.1% | ◎+13.7% | 11.6pt |
| Metric | Mabuchi | Sinfonia | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Share price, 1 year | ◎+32.4% | +3.3% | 29.1pt |
| Share price, 3 months | ◎+2.3% | −10.5% | 12.8pt |
| P/E (trailing)lower = cheaper | 16.1x | 21.3x | |
| Equity ratio | ◎90.3% | 62.3% | 28.0pt |
| Share price (close) | ¥1,710 | ¥10,960 |
◎ marks the best value for each metric. Revenue and profit are from the latest full-year earnings release; share prices are closing-price references; P/E = latest close ÷ trailing EPS. For banks and some other financials, revenue means ordinary income.
| Metric | Mabuchi | Sinfonia | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average salary | ◎¥7.64M | ¥7.49M | ¥0.15M |
| Starting salary (monthly) | ¥287,000 | ¥287,000 | ¥0 |
| Average tenure | 15.9 yrs | ◎16.1 yrs | 0.2 |
| Average age | 43.3 | 39.5 | 3.8 |
| Employees | 760 | 2,080 | 2.7x |
Average salary is for the reporting (parent) company and is affected by average age and job mix. Holding companies with few employees are left out of the salary comparison.
Close (Oct 30, 2026)
¥1,710+32.4% (1Y)
Mabuchi +32.4% over 1Y. Compared: Sinfonia +3.3%.
Reference chart of daily closing prices, not real-time quotes (split-adjusted; weekly closes before the last year). Each line shows the % change from the start of the period. Updated Oct 30, 2026.
Mabuchi4 segments
Sinfonia4 segments
AAverage annual salary from the securities filings: Mabuchi ¥7.64M, Sinfonia ¥7.49M. Mabuchi pays the most. Averages also depend on staff age and job mix, so check the average age too (Mabuchi 43.3, Sinfonia 39.5).
ARevenue in the latest results: Mabuchi ¥200.4B, Sinfonia ¥128.2B. Mabuchi is the bigger company, with revenue of ¥200.4B — 1.6x Sinfonia's ¥128.2B.
AOperating margins: Sinfonia 14.4%, Mabuchi 12.7%. Sinfonia turns the highest share of sales into operating profit.
AShare price change over the past year (closing prices, for reference): Mabuchi +32.4%, Sinfonia +3.3%. Mabuchi has risen the most.
Comparing 2 companies (up to 4)
Sources: earnings releases (kessan tanshin), annual securities reports and other public information. Share prices are closing-price references, not real-time. Our data may contain errors; investment decisions are your own responsibility.
