Prices as of 2026/10/30 close
Company comparison
Mitsubishi Materials is the bigger company, with revenue of ¥1.8T — 39.3x Osaka Titanium's ¥47.0B.
Osaka Titanium earns more on each yen of sales, with an operating margin of 11.8% — 8.5 points above Mitsubishi Materials (3.3%).
Revenue growth in the latest results: Mitsubishi Materials −6.0%, Osaka Titanium −9.6%. For next year, Osaka Titanium guides for the fastest operating profit growth (−38.5%).
Average pay is about the same: Osaka Titanium ¥7.16M, Mitsubishi Materials ¥7.14M.
Over the past year the shares moved Mitsubishi Materials +46.9%, Osaka Titanium −21.0%.
Head-to-head wins15 metrics
One win per metric for the company with the best value. Metrics with no better or worse (P/E, average age, employees) are excluded.
ScaleInvestors
Mitsubishi Materials aheadMitsubishi Materials 3 : Osaka Titanium 0
Revenue: Mitsubishi Materials ¥1.8T / Osaka Titanium ¥47.0B
ProfitabilityInvestors
Osaka Titanium aheadMitsubishi Materials 1 : Osaka Titanium 2
Operating margin: Mitsubishi Materials 3.3% / Osaka Titanium 11.8%
GrowthInvestors
Mitsubishi Materials aheadMitsubishi Materials 3 : Osaka Titanium 1
Revenue growth (YoY): Mitsubishi Materials −6.0% / Osaka Titanium −9.6%
Stock & balance sheetInvestors
Mitsubishi Materials aheadMitsubishi Materials 2 : Osaka Titanium 0
Share price, 1 year: Mitsubishi Materials +46.9% / Osaka Titanium −21.0%
Pay & workforceJob seekers
Osaka Titanium aheadMitsubishi Materials 1 : Osaka Titanium 2
Average salary: Mitsubishi Materials ¥7.14M / Osaka Titanium ¥7.16M
| Metric | Mitsubishi Materials | Osaka Titanium | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ◎¥1.8T | ¥47.0B | 39.3x |
| Operating profit | ◎¥60.5B | ¥5.5B | 11.0x |
| Net income | ◎¥40.6B | ¥2.6B | 15.8x |
| Metric | Mitsubishi Materials | Osaka Titanium | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | 3.3% | ◎11.8% | 8.5pt |
| Net margin | 2.2% | ◎5.5% | 3.3pt |
| ROE | — | 5.9% | |
| Revenue per employee | ◎¥347M | ¥63M | 5.5x |
| Metric | Mitsubishi Materials | Osaka Titanium | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | ◎−6.0% | −9.6% | 3.6pt |
| Operating profit growth (YoY) | ◎+63.0% | −45.2% | 108.2pt |
| Revenue CAGRlast 5 years | +4.4% | — | |
| Guidance: revenue growthnext FY plan | ◎+7.9% | +2.2% | 5.7pt |
| Guidance: op. profit growthnext FY plan | −40.5% | ◎−38.5% | 2.0pt |
| Metric | Mitsubishi Materials | Osaka Titanium | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Share price, 1 year | ◎+46.9% | −21.0% | 67.9pt |
| Share price, 3 months | ◎+9.3% | −18.0% | 27.3pt |
| P/E (trailing)lower = cheaper | — | 30.4x | |
| Equity ratio | — | 41.4% | |
| Share price (close) | ¥4,340 | ¥2,132 |
◎ marks the best value for each metric. Revenue and profit are from the latest full-year earnings release; share prices are closing-price references; P/E = latest close ÷ trailing EPS. For banks and some other financials, revenue means ordinary income.
| Metric | Mitsubishi Materials | Osaka Titanium | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average salary | ¥7.14M | ◎¥7.16M | ¥0.02M |
| Starting salary (monthly) | ¥257,000 | ◎¥260,848 | ¥3,848 |
| Average tenure | ◎18.5 yrs | 16.0 yrs | 2.5 |
| Average age | 43.2 | 43.9 | 0.7 |
| Employees | 5,315 | 742 | 7.2x |
Average salary is for the reporting (parent) company and is affected by average age and job mix. Holding companies with few employees are left out of the salary comparison.
Close (Oct 30, 2026)
¥4,340+46.9% (1Y)
Mitsubishi Materials +46.9% over 1Y. Compared: Osaka Titanium -21.0%.
Reference chart of daily closing prices, not real-time quotes (split-adjusted; weekly closes before the last year). Each line shows the % change from the start of the period. Updated Oct 30, 2026.
AAverage annual salary from the securities filings: Osaka Titanium ¥7.16M, Mitsubishi Materials ¥7.14M. Osaka Titanium pays the most. Averages also depend on staff age and job mix, so check the average age too (Mitsubishi Materials 43.2, Osaka Titanium 43.9).
ARevenue in the latest results: Mitsubishi Materials ¥1.8T, Osaka Titanium ¥47.0B. Mitsubishi Materials is the bigger company, with revenue of ¥1.8T — 39.3x Osaka Titanium's ¥47.0B.
AOperating margins: Osaka Titanium 11.8%, Mitsubishi Materials 3.3%. Osaka Titanium turns the highest share of sales into operating profit.
AShare price change over the past year (closing prices, for reference): Mitsubishi Materials +46.9%, Osaka Titanium −21.0%. Mitsubishi Materials has risen the most.
Comparing 2 companies (up to 4)
Sources: earnings releases (kessan tanshin), annual securities reports and other public information. Share prices are closing-price references, not real-time. Our data may contain errors; investment decisions are your own responsibility.
