Prices as of 2026/10/30 close
Company comparison
UACJ is the bigger company, with revenue of ¥1.2T — 25.2x Osaka Titanium's ¥47.0B.
Osaka Titanium earns more on each yen of sales, with an operating margin of 11.8% — 5.3 points above UACJ (6.5%).
Revenue growth in the latest results: UACJ +18.3%, Osaka Titanium −9.6%. For next year, UACJ guides for the fastest operating profit growth (−16.7%).
UACJ pays more on average — ¥7.78M against ¥7.16M at Osaka Titanium.
Over the past year the shares moved UACJ −1.3%, Osaka Titanium −21.0%.
Head-to-head wins17 metrics
One win per metric for the company with the best value. Metrics with no better or worse (P/E, average age, employees) are excluded.
ScaleInvestors
UACJ aheadUACJ 3 : Osaka Titanium 0
Revenue: UACJ ¥1.2T / Osaka Titanium ¥47.0B
ProfitabilityInvestors
EvenUACJ 2 : Osaka Titanium 2
Operating margin: UACJ 6.5% / Osaka Titanium 11.8%
GrowthInvestors
UACJ aheadUACJ 4 : Osaka Titanium 0
Revenue growth (YoY): UACJ +18.3% / Osaka Titanium −9.6%
Stock & balance sheetInvestors
UACJ aheadUACJ 2 : Osaka Titanium 1
Share price, 1 year: UACJ −1.3% / Osaka Titanium −21.0%
Pay & workforceJob seekers
UACJ aheadUACJ 2 : Osaka Titanium 1
Average salary: UACJ ¥7.78M / Osaka Titanium ¥7.16M
| Metric | UACJ | Osaka Titanium | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ◎¥1.2T | ¥47.0B | 25.2x |
| Operating profit | ◎¥76.9B | ¥5.5B | 13.9x |
| Net income | ◎¥38.9B | ¥2.6B | 15.1x |
| Metric | UACJ | Osaka Titanium | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | 6.5% | ◎11.8% | 5.3pt |
| Net margin | 3.3% | ◎5.5% | 2.2pt |
| ROE | ◎12.2% | 5.9% | 6.3pt |
| Revenue per employee | ◎¥300M | ¥63M | 4.7x |
| Metric | UACJ | Osaka Titanium | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | ◎+18.3% | −9.6% | 27.9pt |
| Operating profit growth (YoY) | ◎+34.0% | −45.2% | 79.2pt |
| Guidance: revenue growthnext FY plan | ◎+10.0% | +2.2% | 7.8pt |
| Guidance: op. profit growthnext FY plan | ◎−16.7% | −38.5% | 21.7pt |
| Metric | UACJ | Osaka Titanium | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Share price, 1 year | ◎−1.3% | −21.0% | 19.7pt |
| Share price, 3 months | ◎−14.4% | −18.0% | 3.6pt |
| P/E (trailing)lower = cheaper | 8.9x | 30.4x | |
| Equity ratio | 34.3% | ◎41.4% | 7.1pt |
| Share price (close) | ¥1,909 | ¥2,132 |
◎ marks the best value for each metric. Revenue and profit are from the latest full-year earnings release; share prices are closing-price references; P/E = latest close ÷ trailing EPS. For banks and some other financials, revenue means ordinary income.
| Metric | UACJ | Osaka Titanium | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average salary | ◎¥7.78M | ¥7.16M | ¥0.62M |
| Starting salary (monthly) | ◎¥311,150 | ¥260,848 | ¥50,302 |
| Average tenure | 15.5 yrs | ◎16.0 yrs | 0.5 |
| Average age | 41.4 | 43.9 | 2.5 |
| Employees | 3,943 | 742 | 5.3x |
Average salary is for the reporting (parent) company and is affected by average age and job mix. Holding companies with few employees are left out of the salary comparison.
Close (Oct 30, 2026)
¥1,909-1.3% (1Y)
UACJ -1.3% over 1Y. Compared: Osaka Titanium -21.0%.
Reference chart of daily closing prices, not real-time quotes (split-adjusted; weekly closes before the last year). Each line shows the % change from the start of the period. Updated Oct 30, 2026.
AAverage annual salary from the securities filings: UACJ ¥7.78M, Osaka Titanium ¥7.16M. UACJ pays the most. Averages also depend on staff age and job mix, so check the average age too (UACJ 41.4, Osaka Titanium 43.9).
ARevenue in the latest results: UACJ ¥1.2T, Osaka Titanium ¥47.0B. UACJ is the bigger company, with revenue of ¥1.2T — 25.2x Osaka Titanium's ¥47.0B.
AOperating margins: Osaka Titanium 11.8%, UACJ 6.5%. Osaka Titanium turns the highest share of sales into operating profit.
AShare price change over the past year (closing prices, for reference): UACJ −1.3%, Osaka Titanium −21.0%. UACJ has risen the most.
Comparing 2 companies (up to 4)
Sources: earnings releases (kessan tanshin), annual securities reports and other public information. Share prices are closing-price references, not real-time. Our data may contain errors; investment decisions are your own responsibility.
