Prices as of 2026/10/30 close
Company comparison
Mitsui Kinzoku is the bigger company, with revenue of ¥758.5B — 16.2x Osaka Titanium's ¥47.0B.
Mitsui Kinzoku earns more on each yen of sales, with an operating margin of 17.3% — 5.5 points above Osaka Titanium (11.8%).
Revenue growth in the latest results: Mitsui Kinzoku +6.5%, Osaka Titanium −9.6%. For next year, Mitsui Kinzoku guides for the fastest operating profit growth (−30.5%).
Mitsui Kinzoku pays more on average — ¥8.96M against ¥7.16M at Osaka Titanium.
Over the past year the shares moved Mitsui Kinzoku +29.9%, Osaka Titanium −21.0%.
Head-to-head wins15 metrics
One win per metric for the company with the best value. Metrics with no better or worse (P/E, average age, employees) are excluded.
ScaleInvestors
Mitsui Kinzoku aheadMitsui Kinzoku 3 : Osaka Titanium 0
Revenue: Mitsui Kinzoku ¥758.5B / Osaka Titanium ¥47.0B
ProfitabilityInvestors
Mitsui Kinzoku aheadMitsui Kinzoku 3 : Osaka Titanium 0
Operating margin: Mitsui Kinzoku 17.3% / Osaka Titanium 11.8%
GrowthInvestors
Mitsui Kinzoku aheadMitsui Kinzoku 4 : Osaka Titanium 0
Revenue growth (YoY): Mitsui Kinzoku +6.5% / Osaka Titanium −9.6%
Stock & balance sheetInvestors
EvenMitsui Kinzoku 1 : Osaka Titanium 1
Share price, 1 year: Mitsui Kinzoku +29.9% / Osaka Titanium −21.0%
Pay & workforceJob seekers
Mitsui Kinzoku aheadMitsui Kinzoku 2 : Osaka Titanium 1
Average salary: Mitsui Kinzoku ¥8.96M / Osaka Titanium ¥7.16M
| Metric | Mitsui Kinzoku | Osaka Titanium | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ◎¥758.5B | ¥47.0B | 16.2x |
| Operating profit | ◎¥130.9B | ¥5.5B | 23.7x |
| Net income | ◎¥91.3B | ¥2.6B | 35.4x |
| Metric | Mitsui Kinzoku | Osaka Titanium | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | ◎17.3% | 11.8% | 5.5pt |
| Net margin | ◎12.0% | 5.5% | 6.5pt |
| ROE | — | 5.9% | |
| Revenue per employee | ◎¥293M | ¥63M | 4.6x |
| Metric | Mitsui Kinzoku | Osaka Titanium | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | ◎+6.5% | −9.6% | 16.1pt |
| Operating profit growth (YoY) | ◎+75.1% | −45.2% | 120.3pt |
| Revenue CAGRlast 5 years | +7.7% | — | |
| Guidance: revenue growthnext FY plan | ◎+9.4% | +2.2% | 7.2pt |
| Guidance: op. profit growthnext FY plan | ◎−30.5% | −38.5% | 8.0pt |
| Metric | Mitsui Kinzoku | Osaka Titanium | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Share price, 1 year | ◎+29.9% | −21.0% | 50.9pt |
| Share price, 3 months | −25.5% | ◎−18.0% | 7.6pt |
| P/E (trailing)lower = cheaper | — | 30.4x | |
| Equity ratio | — | 41.4% | |
| Share price (close) | ¥2,017.5 | ¥2,132 |
◎ marks the best value for each metric. Revenue and profit are from the latest full-year earnings release; share prices are closing-price references; P/E = latest close ÷ trailing EPS. For banks and some other financials, revenue means ordinary income.
| Metric | Mitsui Kinzoku | Osaka Titanium | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average salary | ◎¥8.96M | ¥7.16M | ¥1.80M |
| Starting salary (monthly) | ◎¥275,000 | ¥260,848 | ¥14,152 |
| Average tenure | 13.9 yrs | ◎16.0 yrs | 2.1 |
| Average age | 42.9 | 43.9 | 1.0 |
| Employees | 2,587 | 742 | 3.5x |
Average salary is for the reporting (parent) company and is affected by average age and job mix. Holding companies with few employees are left out of the salary comparison.
Close (Oct 30, 2026)
¥2,017.5+29.9% (1Y)
Mitsui Kinzoku +29.9% over 1Y. Compared: Osaka Titanium -21.0%.
Reference chart of daily closing prices, not real-time quotes (split-adjusted; weekly closes before the last year). Each line shows the % change from the start of the period. Updated Oct 30, 2026.
AAverage annual salary from the securities filings: Mitsui Kinzoku ¥8.96M, Osaka Titanium ¥7.16M. Mitsui Kinzoku pays the most. Averages also depend on staff age and job mix, so check the average age too (Mitsui Kinzoku 42.9, Osaka Titanium 43.9).
ARevenue in the latest results: Mitsui Kinzoku ¥758.5B, Osaka Titanium ¥47.0B. Mitsui Kinzoku is the bigger company, with revenue of ¥758.5B — 16.2x Osaka Titanium's ¥47.0B.
AOperating margins: Mitsui Kinzoku 17.3%, Osaka Titanium 11.8%. Mitsui Kinzoku turns the highest share of sales into operating profit.
AShare price change over the past year (closing prices, for reference): Mitsui Kinzoku +29.9%, Osaka Titanium −21.0%. Mitsui Kinzoku has risen the most.
Comparing 2 companies (up to 4)
Sources: earnings releases (kessan tanshin), annual securities reports and other public information. Share prices are closing-price references, not real-time. Our data may contain errors; investment decisions are your own responsibility.
