Mid-Tier Chip Equipment Makers FY2026 Full Year: AI Demand Splits Earnings
Companies compared · 5

ULVAC
6728

Rorze
6323
Nomura Micro
6254

Shibaura
6590
Accretech
7729
Takeaway
Generative AI demand drives sharp polarization among mid-tier chip equipment makers.
Full-year earnings for five mid-tier chip equipment makers in the FY2026 period show a stark polarization. While generative AI acts as a strong tailwind, results have clearly split into winners and losers.
Overall Industry Trends
The semiconductor industry is booming due to the rapid spread of generative AI, driving robust investment in high-performance devices, particularly for data centers. Conversely, investment in power devices has slowed down, and flat panel displays (FPD) remain in a prolonged slump. This uneven demand has polarized corporate earnings, though current order books remain extremely strong, prompting mostly bullish forecasts for the upcoming fiscal term.
The Divide: Winners and Losers
The clear winner this term is Accretech, which grew sales by 10.8% year-on-year to 166.8 billion yen. Operating profit rose 13.6% to 33.7 billion yen, buoyed by the company successfully capturing generative AI demand to post a high operating margin of 20.2%. On the other hand, Nomura Micro struggled, with revenue plummeting 41.6% to 56.2 billion yen and operating profit sinking 56.6% to 6.7 billion yen. The decline was primarily a reaction to large-scale projects wrapping up in the previous fiscal year, which the company views as a temporary transition phase before orders bounce back to projected record highs in the next term.
Winner
Accretech
Laggard
Nomura Micro
Revenue Ranking
ULVAC retained the top revenue spot at 269.1 billion yen, with Accretech in close pursuit in second place. Nomura Micro experienced a temporary revenue decline due to the wrap-up of major projects, widening the scale gap among the companies.
Operating Profit Ranking
Accretech took the top spot in operating profit at 33.7 billion yen. Rorze followed closely behind at 31.2 billion yen, demonstrating robust earning power driven by high-value-added wafer transfer systems.
Operating Margin Ranking
Rorze led with an operating margin of 24.2%, followed by Accretech at 20.2%. Both companies generated stellar margins exceeding 20% by capturing niche segments with high technical barriers.
Key Strategic Moves and Comparisons
Shibaura successfully completed a major transition, shifting its main focus from FPD to back-end packaging equipment for generative AI, yielding growth in both sales and profits on the back of advanced packaging systems. Rorze leveraged its strength in wafer transfer systems, performing well with advanced logic customers in Taiwan. Despite booking one-off extraordinary losses, its operating profit margin reached 24.2%, leading all five companies. Meanwhile, ULVAC saw a massive surge in bookings, with order volume jumping 43.7% year-on-year to 324.2 billion yen. High material costs dragged down its profits, but its long-term outlook remains exceptionally strong.
Shared Industry Risks
The major players face several shared risks:
- Dependence on the Chinese market and the impact of its investment slowdown
- Foreign exchange fluctuations affecting profitability
- Rising raw material and energy costs squeezing margins
- Delayed project commencements due to shifts in client investment timelines
Outlook for Job Seekers and Career Changers
This sector is home to high-performing companies that punch far above their level of public recognition. The profitability of firms like Rorze and Accretech is remarkable, as manufacturing companies rarely achieve operating margins above 15%. Boasting superior technological capabilities and global reach, their overwhelmingly high profitability remains their biggest draw. For both investors and job seekers, this is a sector that demands close attention.
Year-on-Year Revenue Growth
Accretech and Shibaura both achieved positive revenue growth by capturing special demand from AI. In contrast, Nomura Micro saw a temporary drop in revenue, highlighting the heavy impact of client investment cycles.
Year-on-Year Net Income Growth
Shibaura and ULVAC both expanded net profits. The other three firms experienced profit declines due to one-off costs such as litigation expenses and quality assurance provisions, creating divergence based on non-operating factors.
